The Screen Actors Guild Awards, or SAG Awards, were first given out in 1995.
Throughout their history, they have rewarded plenty of exceptional performances.
However, they’ve also lauded some less-than-deserving ones.
Image via Warner Bros. Pictures
To be totally fair, there has never been a single SAG-winning performance that’s bad.
She’s accompanied by a vast ensemble of secondary characters both friendly and hostile.
Everything Everywhereis one ofthe best post-pandemic sci-fi moviesby a decent margin, brimming with creativity and existentialist wit.
Image via TriStar Pictures
Curtis is hilarious as Deirdre, adding a surprisingly physical slapstick dimension to a surprisingly nuanced character.
To be fair, Rami Malek’s performance isn’t one of them.
Malek is great as Freddie, nailing the concert sequences and the more emotional moments from the story.
The script and direction are largely to blame, but Malek’s performance feels a bit too one-note.
Likewise, Paltrow is okay inShakespeare in Love.
That’s just the thing, though: Alright performances shouldn’t be winning SAGs.
Image via A24
KEEP READING:The Worst Best Supporting Actress Winner of Each Decade
Image via Miramax Films
Image via Sony Pictures Releasing
Image via Miramax Films
Image via 20th Century Studios
Image via 20th Century Studios
Image via 20th Century Studios
Image Via Warner Bros.
Image via Miramax Films
