The book was an instant success with critics and audiences.

The earliest surviving version ofLittle WomenisGeorge Cukor’s 1933 effort starring three-time Oscar winnerKatharine Hepburn.

Subsequently, three other adaptations followed in 1949, 1994, and 2019.

Eliza Scanlen, Saoirse Ronan, Emma Watson, and Florence Pugh in Greta Gerwig’s Little Women

Image via Jefferson Chacon

1949’sLittle Womencan’t really stand on its own.

However, George Cukor’s version ofLittle Womenplayed as big a part in her success.

The film

Depression-era audiences embraced this version ofLittle Women.

The four March sisters gathered around a lamp in Little Women 1949

Image via MGM

Still,1933’sLittle Womenis all about Katharine Hepburn.

For years after the film’s release, decades even,Hepburn remained the definitive portrayal of Jo March.

In her words, she just can’t give up her dreams to “go be a wife.

Cast Placeholder Image

The film also makes a brilliant choice of not presenting Amy as an antagonist.

Aided byFlorence Pugh’s Oscar-nominated turnand Gerwig’s layered writing, Amy becomes as complex as Jo.

2019’sLittle Womenunderstands the story better than any version, resulting in the best cinematic of this beloved literary masterwork.

The March sisters smiling in Little Women

Image via Warner Bros. Discovery

Watch on Hulu

NEXT:10 Movies To Watch if You Love Jane Austen

little-women-1933-poster.jpg

The March sisters and Marmie watching as Beth plays the piano in Little Women

Image via Columbia Pictures

Little Women

Little Women (1994)

Little Women